What's a Blog?
Published on October 19, 2007 By Mumblefratz In Metaverse

This is where we will keep all the rules used for the Metaverse League (MVL). The point is to have a single place where all rules are defined and so there's a single place where people can refer to resolve all question.

I will continually update this OP to reflect the current state of rules that we have all agreed to. The point is to make this as simple and concise as possible. As we have seen argument and upset occurs when different people have different interpretations of what has been agreed. Keeping these rules as simple and short as possible will help reduce potential conflict.



Rule 1) Rule changes are not allowed in the middle of a round. If an unanticipated situation develops in the middle of a round all effort should be made to deal with it as consistently as possible based on current rules and precedent. In the hopefully rare cases this is not possible the Commissioner will make an arbitrary ruling on how the matter will be resolved for the current round. Once the round is over then the issue can be revisited and a more permanent solution can be decided by the members of the League. Note that this arbitrary ruling can only be made by the Commissioner. Also the Commissioner is the only person that can grant an exception to any rule, but this power should be used judiciously.

Rule 2) Team Size. People may join the League and start playing at pretty much anytime. In the middle of a round a new player should be randomly assigned a new team by either the Commissioner or Vice Commissioner. The only limitation is that at any point in time no team should have more than one more player than any other team.

Also people may have to announce that they can't submit during a round. This can be treated using the scoring rules related to non-submission or if it's early in the round the teams could be re-balanced by the Commissioner. The decision to re-balance or not, and if so who to move, is soley the decision of the Commissioner.

The ideal team size is 5 since it provides some protection against an unforeseen non-submittal without being too unweildly. Team size at the beginning of a round should never be less than 4 or more than 6.

Rule 3) Honor System. Each round of play consists of a game (or games) of randomly selected settings and victory conditions. Very few of the required settings can be verified, namely galaxy size and victory condition. The fact that all other settings cannot be verified requires the league to operate on the honor system.

From time to time various versions of the game may exhibit a bug that temporarily allows some particular exploit. When and if this happens people should make sure the league is aware of the situation but no rule will be made to prohibit the particular exploit other than the same honor system that ensures everyone is playing the same game.

A final point about the honor system is that abuse of the honor system doesn't debase a single game played by a single player but debases every game played by every player. When seen in this light I'm sure that no one would be tempted to risk shaking the foundation of the league just to gain a miniscule benefit by intentionally bending a setting or rule. Also everyone should realize that honest mistakes do happen and if occasionally someone makes a mistake in a required game setting that it's no real big deal.

A corollary to the fact that only galaxy size and victory condition can be verified, along with the practice of taking a game submitted to the metaverse but not submitted to the league as a persons "intended" league submission, results in the rule that people should not have games submitted to the metaverse under their league character that might be confused with a legitimate league game. Note that clearly once a player has made a submission for the current round there can be no such confusion.

Honor System Addendum

The deliberate and determined use by a Player, with full knowledge and intent, of repeatedly and excessively, exploiting bugs, quirks, or other miscellanea in a game to achieve an outcome not normally possible is hereby prohibited in the MVL.

Rule 4) Reported Difficulty Levels and Race Customization in MVL Games

Every MVL player is honor bound to ensure that the effective difficulty of any game they submit is accurately represented by the games posted difficulty. To support this requirement the following guidance is provided.

External modification of any game related files are prohibited in MVL games.

In-game modification of opponent characteristics is prohibited in MVL games. The only choices allowed are the selection of opponents from among the default standard races and default custom race and the selection of their difficulty levels.

All opponent starting relations must be set to "Unknown".

DA games must be set to Allow Surrenders.

Rule 5) MVL Member Behavior

In the case where a MVL member has been found to be cheating, being overly disruptive, or detrimental to the League in some form, the commissioner is free to levy the following punishments as he deems necessary and appropriate. Such punishments may include; the loss of a team Captaincy or other MVL Administrative Position, the loss of the Player's points earned in a particular Round, forcing the Player to sit out a Round, or any other temporary punishment deemed appropriate.

For anything deemed worthy of a permanent ban from the league then besides the recommendation of the commissioner it should also require the consensus of the captains and other MVL administrators to make the ban permanent. Once banned then continued disruption of MVL threads and activities will be appropriately reported to forum authorities.



Scoring

A team's score consists of the sum of "base" scores plus individual and team bonus points.

Base Score

A player's base score is simply 2 points for a win of the designated type, 1 point for a win of the wrong type and 0 points otherwise. A team’s base score is the sum of the four top player base scores submitted. This is done so that a team having more players has no advantage over a team with fewer players.

There are two types of rounds that are treated slightly differently. One is a “Single Victory” type round where all players play for the same victory condition. The other is an “All Victories” type round where each team must submit at least one game of each of the 4 different victory types.

Non-Submission

In the Single Victory round if a player neglects to submit a game then there is no issue as long as the team still has at least four other players that submitted a game. However, if the team only had four players to begin with then they would be missing one potential contribution to the team’s base score. If this non-submission is pre-announced (this is highly encouraged), then either the Commissioner or Vice Commissioner may randomly select another member of the team to submit another game to count towards the teams base score.

In the case where no notice is given, if the player has a single game that fits the rounds criteria as to date, galaxy size and victory condition posted to the Metaverse but not yet submitted to the league then that game will be presumed to be submitted "automatically" to the league during the last minute of the round. If there are more than one qualifying game posted to the metaverse under the players MVL character than the game with the highest score/year ratio will be the game submitted to the league. If two or more games have identical score/year ratios then the submitted game shall be randomly selected from these games by the commissioner or vice commissioner whichever is not a memeber of the team in question. Note that players should make sure that any games that "appear" to match the current rounds criteria posted to the MV do indeed satisfy all the current rounds criteria. This can always be accomplished by simply waiting until your official has been made before posting a game to the MV that might otherwise be confused with the current MVL game.

In the case where no notice is given, and if other members of the team have other games that satisfy the round’s criteria that have already been submitted to the metaverse then either the Commissioner or Vice Commissioner may randomly select one of these games to count towards the teams base score. In this case the team should identify *all* such games that satisfy the round’s criteria for possible selection not simply the *best* such game.

If the non-submission is not pre-announced and the team has no “extra” qualifying games then the team gets credit only for the number of base scores properly submitted.

Note that a team of 5 players with two players that failed to submit a game would be in a similar situation as described above and the same rules apply. The same is true with 6 players and 3 non-submissions, etc. It is also possible for a team to be more than one submission short of the required total of 4 in which case the same rules can be applied to possibly allow the team to make up for more than one non-submission.

Finally these same rules apply in the case of an All Victories round but with an extra qualification. This extra requirement is that in an All Victories round each team is required to submit at least one game of each victory type. In this case the team may be required to use an “extra” game as described by the rules above that duplicates the victory type of an already submitted game. In this case for base scoring purposes that game would have to be considered a 1 point victory of the wrong type. Note that such a game could still receive individual and team bonus points based on the correct victory category.

Individual Bonus Points

In the case of a Single Victory round a single bonus point is granted for the 4 top scoring games and the 4 fastest games.

In the case of an All Victory round a single bonus point is given to the top score and the fastest game in each of the 4 different victory conditions.

The fastest games are determined by the number of years reported by the metaverse. Game speed ties are broken by score and score ties are broken by speed. Any games tied in both speed and score will be left unbroken and both players will receive the identical bonus.

Team Bonus Points

All team bonus points are based on the average of the team’s submitted games. Just as in the individual bonus point case only wins of the correct type are counted. The 1st place team receives 2 points and the 2nd place team receives 1 point in the following categories.

Team Score

Team Speed (speed of game reported by metaverse)

Team Submission (number of days into the round before game is submitted to the league)

Any teams tied in any team bonus category receive the same bonus. However, any fractional result is not subject to rounding and any tie must be exact.



MVL Voting Rules

1. Any MVL member can call for a vote among any number of competing proposals which must be seconded by two other MVL members to be considered official.

2. All votes will occur in the Galciv II Metaverse Leagues forum at the Core and notice must also be given in the current MVL Round thread.

3. All votes should run for a period of time specified in the OP of the voting thread. This period should be no shorter than 1 week or longer than 3 weeks. It's encouraged but not required that votes should be completed before the start of the next round of play if at all possible.

4. A valid vote requires participation by at least 50% of active MVL members. An abstention counts as participation. A proposal requires 60% or more of the cast ballots to be accepted. If less than 60% is achieved by any one proposal there will be a runoff between the two most popular options. The winner of the runoff will be the proposal that achieves a simple majority of votes cast with no quorum requirement.

5. Editing of your vote is allowed although any changes should be made in such a way as to make it obvious that a change has occured.

6. Once the time specified for the vote expires the thread will be locked to maintain an accurate record of the vote. The results of any vote are final and can only be changed by a subsequent official MVL vote.

Rules accepted by Consensus

From time to time minor issues may crop up that may not warrent the full attention of the League. In such cases a limited number of members may discuss the issue and come to some agreement. As long as no member of the league voices any objection to such an agreement and as long as such an agreement has been posted in a prominent thread (the current round thread or the MVL Rule thread) for a period of one week then that rule will be considered to be "official" by the league.

Besides any MVL member voicing an objection to the proposed rule, thereby invalidating the proposal, any member could also move to have a vote taken on the proposal which, as specified in our voting rules, requires a vote be taken as long as the motion is seconded by two other MVL members.



Last update Mar 28, 2008. Added Race Configuration Rule and Honor System Addendum

 


Comments (Page 27)
31 PagesFirst 25 26 27 28 29  Last
on Mar 15, 2008
Oh yes, I am very familiar with Spacetimer's scores. I was the one who alerted Stardock initially, and at least now he is banned from the AltMeta. Nothing was done with the official MV though, in regards to him.

Kzinti empire2.JPG Sentient species taste better...
on Mar 15, 2008
And nobody knows how he did it? Weird.
on Mar 15, 2008
Many of us suspect that he is hex editing his scores directly.
on Mar 15, 2008
What the heck is going on with this thread?

I'm positive that I made a reply that existed between JustinSane4's reply #386 and PlayJeff45's reply #387.

What happened to my reply? Did an Admin delete it? I mean even the porn posted wasn't totally deleted, only the content deleted with a note as to what happened.

Both PlayJeff45's reply #387 and KzintiPatriarch's reply #388 refer to a previous post by me even though there is no other evidence that it ever existed.

To summarize the content of that reply I basically stated that this appears to come down to a choice between one group of folks that would be restricted from playing games precisely as they would wish if this practice is banned versus another group of folks that would somehow feel taken advantage of if this practice is allowed.

While I don't like the idea that people wouldn't be allowed to play the game that they prefer to play I like the idea that some people would feel taken advantage of even less. I therefore concluded that the best interests of the league are served if we ban both ARC and straw men opponents.

Now if anyone can explain where my previous post disappeared to that would be comforting.
on Mar 15, 2008
I have no idea why your previous post disappeared, but I completely agree with what you just said.

edit: Did you perhaps post in the round 7 thread? There is a post by you there quite similar to what you've described.
on Mar 15, 2008
I have no idea why your previous post disappeared, but I completely agree with what you just said.

edit: Did you perhaps post in the round 7 thread? There is a post by you there quite similar to what you've described.

Thanks.

Yep that's it. Must be getting old.
on Mar 15, 2008
This is clearly the most dividing force we've ever come across. With such a great thing going on in the MVL, it would be horrendous to lose even 1 player because of this.
Now this was reopened because of Wyndstar (Oh those Lawyers.) His 1yr game that took 60hrs of gameplay was repeated and it took him no time at all. Now I don't think many of the players would get that much of an advantage compared to Wyndstar.

Just ban Wyndstar from using them  
on Mar 15, 2008
Can anyone explain the difference between an ARC and a mod? If you play anything else but what you downloaded from Stardock or came off of the CD, aren't you playing a modded game?

Where does it end? In Round 8, a player called Einstein figures out a little tweak of the .bcd files. No big deal. Just that when he captures an AI colony he gets 3 of their techs instead of one.
In Round 9, a player called Paris Hilton diddles with the .xyz files. Very minor, not a mod or anything like that. Just that in battles his ships fire an extra shot every other round.
In Round 10...
on Mar 15, 2008
We do seem to be discussing this in both threads which can be a bit confusing.

I think my argument from above seems to be making sense to a good amount of people. I repeat it here for convenience.

While I don't like the idea that people wouldn't be allowed to play the game that they prefer to play I like the idea that some people would feel taken advantage of even less. I therefore concluded that the best interests of the league are served if we ban both ARC and straw men opponents.


From the other thread Neilo mentioned agreement with this and I repeat the response I made to him here as well.

Well i agree completely, as it seems many others do also. If we could get a confirmation from FB as vice commish on this that would tie this up nicely.

Well we really have two options. One is to see if we seem to have consensus and then write it up as a proposal and wait for a week to see if anyone objects and the other is to simply take it to a vote which should also run for a week.

As far as either vice commissioner or even commissioner just making a pronouncement and calling it a rule I think this goes beyond what should be handled in that manner.

In fact I think this is of sufficient magnitude that I really believe the only definitive option is to have a league wide vote on the issue. Assuming we do have pretty much league wide support then a vote with an overwhelming majority is the best way to close the issue.

It could be a simple vote between the approval or disapproval of a new rule to ban these practices.

One issue I have is that I don't feel knowledgeable enough to write the simple and complete rule since I'm unfamiliar with the workings of DA.

Also writing such a rule is not the trivial thing that I assume most people imagine. Everyone knows what they think such a rule means but a well worded definition needs to be short, needs to cover all the possible options, not leave any loose ends, and needs to not be subject to second guessing. It's actually a very difficult thing to do.

As a lawyer I would expect Wyndstar should be able to come up with the best possible wording for a proposal for a new rule to add.
on Mar 15, 2008
I like the additional options for my own race setup. I enjoy it and it's an avenue of strategy. I don't think it's cheating. However, the MVL and the Meteverse in general are not the same thing. If players are feeling alienated by ARC, I can refrain from the practice for the sake the MVL's health. I'm not happy about it, but better to keep the MVL together than have it fall apart over something I can live without.

Take a vote. You know how I will vote, but it appears most people are taking the nay position.
on Mar 16, 2008
Everyone knows what they think such a rule means but a well worded definition needs to be short, needs to cover all the possible options, not leave any loose ends, and needs to not be subject to second guessing. It's actually a very difficult thing to do.

As a lawyer I would expect Wyndstar should be able to come up with the best possible wording for a proposal for a new rule to add.



Wait wait wait. You want something concise and also written by a lawyer? No offense but I don't think you hang out with too many lawyers in that case. If you want something over-long and technical, that's when you call me in.


However, If I were to write the rule, it would look like this:

"
ARC, or Advanced Race Customization, refers to altering the Dark Avatar xml files out of the game to change abilities, alignment and starting planets. For overall balance the use of ARC xml customization is banned in MVL competition, whether altering enemy races or the player race.

"Straw dogs" refers to a variety of practices, done either through the in-game interface or with out of game xml customization, that artificially weakens an AI player below the true difficulty setting. Choosing "straw dog" enemies or deliberately handicapping your opponents during setup is banned in MVL competition. "Straw dog" practices include, but are not limited to, lowering aggression ratings, removing super abilities, removing starting tech, choosing "lame duck" abilities and super abilities, changing enemy starting worlds, lowering enemy income and resource sliders, and setting weak enemy political parties.

Both ARC and "straw dog" prohibitions are to be enforced by the honor code. Every player has an obligation to themselves, their teammates and the league as a whole not to engage in either of these practices for official MVL games.

Other practices, not explicitly included herein, which have the general effect of artificially boosting the abilities normally available to a player race in-game, or that unfairly handicap AI players, are also prohibited by the honor code until such time as they are discovered and can be specifically banned by the MVL community.
"


Alter that as you see fit.

~ Wyndstar
on Mar 16, 2008
Looks good to me.
on Mar 16, 2008
Sounds pretty good to me too.
on Mar 16, 2008
hi y'all! I just flew in from Las Vegas and phew! are my arms tired (cue raucous laughter and applause)

Ok...down to business.

Whoa, lots to read....ok, same old stuff, different day

Like the legalese Wyndstar...

@Mumble let's get the Vote set up ASAP

to everyone else: While I have personally used ARC in the past, I am throwing my support 100% against the use of ARCs and "Straw Opponents" in the MVL. This has quite gotten out of hand it seems and the whole issue needs to be reigned in. Along with that, I would like to make an addendum to Wyndstar's legalese of Mumble's proposal from a week ago of "players play at the level expected of them" (or some such, he knows what I mean)

That I think covers the Rulebook thread, now its on to the Round 7 thread
on Mar 16, 2008
Very well then.. I second Wyndstar's proposed rule. (I think that is how this is supposed to work anyway).
31 PagesFirst 25 26 27 28 29  Last